In honor of the Packers traveling to Miami this Sunday, I
thought I’d revisit the greatest Hollywood field goal attempt in recent memory –
that from Ace Ventura, Pet Detective (1994). I’m going to go ahead and assume
you’ve seen it because if you haven’t, honestly, I feel bad for you.
But the main antagonist’s desire for revenge stems from the
kicker’s miss of a potential Super Bowl-winning field goal due to the classic
laces out vs. laces in argument. Now, most people assume the football should be
positioned toward the goal post (laces out) rather than toward the kicker
(laces in). This supposedly allows the kicker to connect with the smooth part
of the ball, and better control its trajectory.
But is this always the case? What if the laces were in for
the only pro athlete to come out of Cauler County? The Ranter was determined to
find out so along with our advanced software engineering intern, Log Jam, we
hit our in-house 3D virtual laboratory to see if a laces-in kick would’ve
allowed Ray Finkle to make that fateful field goal in Ace Ventura.
First of all, let’s take a good look at the kick. As you can
see, the ball just sails juuuuuust past the left goal post.
 |
| "Ray Finkle blew a 26-yard field goal!" |
Taking a virtual model of the field goal post, then
triangulating the position of the ball with relation to distance of kick, we
discover the ball passes a mere twelve inches to the left – a relative
minuscule amount. In other words, by not striking the ball perpendicular to its
axis, one could say Finkle simply “pulled the kick.” By extrapolating the distance
(W) of the missed kick within the Cartesian coordinate system of a simple X-Y
graph, we can see a clear +2.3-degree variance along the X axis (marked in
blue) accounts for the noted deviation.
Now, let’s reverse this mathematically induced scenario with
laces-in circumstances. You’ll notice immediately that the convex physical
characteristics of the laces (NFL standard laces protrusion = approx. 5.5mm) allows
Ray to connect with the ball earlier, actually offsetting the x axis variance from
the laces-in model and striking the ball perfectly square.
The kick is clean and true, traveling perfectly straight through the uprights. He makes the field goal, guys. *drops mic*
Conclusion: In most cases, the common laces-out configuration holds true (pun
intended). However, the aforementioned scientific analysis provides sufficient evidence
that a laces-IN kick would’ve indeed allowed Ray Finkle to make the field goal described in the seminal film, Ace Ventura, Pet Detective (1994).
And if you TROLLS dare question the translation accuracy of the
visual medium, let it be known that Log Jam spent numerous hours analyzing samples
of 1980’s projector-style reel footage superimposed onto 1990's Hollywood-style 35mm
film and then compressed the into Youtube’s 2014 online platform. (Turns out,
it’s basically a wash.)
 |
| Log Jam earning his letter of recommendation |
Edit: I just realized if Ray Finkle makes the kick, it creates
a significant distortion in the space-time continuum of the Ace Ventura movie universe. That
means Ray Finkle never transforms into Lieutenant Einhorn in order to seek out
revenge. A young-Courtney-now-a-cougar-Cox never reaches out to Ace Ventura to
find Snowflake. The entire story is erased from existence and the world misses out on one
of the greatest comedic performances of all time!
S#$T! How do I delete this post?
Damn it, Jim – I’m a scientist, not a computer programmer!
